<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/4/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/26" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/1">
        <title>Facts, values, and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): an update on the controversies</title>
        <description>The Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute, is holding a series of 5 workshops to examine the controversies surrounding the use of medication to treat emotional and behavioral disturbances in children. These workshops bring together clinicians, researchers, scholars, and advocates with diverse perspectives and from diverse fields. Our first commentary in CAPMH, which grew out of our first workshop, explained our method and explored the controversies in general. This commentary, which grows out of our second workshop, explains why informed people can disagree about ADHD diagnosis and treatment. Based on what workshop participants said and our understanding of the literature, we make 8 points. (1) The ADHD label is based on the interpretation of a heterogeneous set of symptoms that cause impairment. (2) Because symptoms and impairments are dimensional, there is an inevitable &quot;zone of ambiguity,&quot; which reasonable people will interpret differently. (3) Many other variables, from different systems and tools of diagnosis to different parenting styles and expectations, also help explain why behaviors associated with ADHD can be interpreted differently. (4) Because people hold competing views about the proper goals of psychiatry and parenting, some people will be more, and others less, concerned about treating children in the zone of ambiguity. (5) To recognize that nature has written no bright line between impaired and unimpaired children, and that it is the responsibility of humans to choose who should receive a diagnosis, does not diminish the significance of ADHD. (6) Once ADHD is diagnosed, the facts surrounding the most effective treatment are complicated and incomplete; contrary to some popular wisdom, behavioral treatments, alone or in combination with low doses of medication, can be effective in the long-term reduction of core ADHD symptoms and at improving many aspects of overall functioning. (7) Especially when a child occupies the zone of ambiguity, different people will emphasize different values embedded in the pharmacological and behavioral approaches. (8) Truly informed decision-making requires that parents (and to the extent they are able, children) have some sense of the complicated and incomplete facts regarding the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Erik Parens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josephine Johnston</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2009, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-3-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-3-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/15">
        <title>Cost-utility analysis of different treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder in sexually abused children</title>
        <description>Background:
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is diagnosed in 20% to 53% of sexually abused children and adolescents. Living with PTSD is associated with a loss of health-related quality of life. Based on the best available evidence, the NICE Guideline for PTSD in children and adolescents recommends cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) over non-directive counselling as a more efficacious treatment.
Methods:
A modelled economic evaluation conducted from the Australian mental health care system perspective estimates incremental costs and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) of TF-CBT, TF-CBT combined with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and non-directive counselling. The &quot;no treatment&quot; alternative is included as a comparator. The first part of the model consists of a decision tree corresponding to 12 month follow-up outcomes observed in clinical trials. The second part consists of a 30 year Markov model representing the slow process of recovery in non-respondents and the untreated population yielding estimates of long-term quality-adjusted survival and costs. Data from the 2007 Australian Mental Health Survey was used to populate the decision analytic model.
Results:
In the base-case and sensitivity analyses, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for all three active treatment alternatives remained less than A$7,000 per QALY gained. The base-case results indicated that non-directive counselling is dominated by TF-CBT and TF-CBT + SSRI, and that efficiency gain can be achieved by allocating more resources toward these therapies. However, this result was sensitive to variation in the clinical effectiveness parameters with non-directive counselling dominating TF-CBT and TF-CBT + SSRI under certain assumptions. The base-case results also suggest that TF-CBT + SSRI is more cost-effective than TF-CBT.
Conclusion:
Even after accounting for uncertainty in parameter estimates, the results of the modelled economic evaluation demonstrated that all psychotherapy treatments for PTSD in sexually abused children have a favourable ICER relative to no treatment. The results also highlighted the loss of quality of life in children who do not receive any psychotherapy. Results of the base-case analysis suggest that TF-CBT + SSRI is more cost-effective than TF-CBT alone, however, considering the uncertainty associated with prescribing SSRIs to children and adolescents, clinicians and parents may exercise some caution in choosing this treatment alternative.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Elena Gospodarevskaya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leonie Segal</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2012, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-6-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-6-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/25">
        <title>Environmental and genetic influences on early attachment</title>
        <description>Attachment theory predicts and subsequent empirical research has amply demonstrated that individual variations in patterns of early attachment behaviour are primarily influenced by differences in sensitive responsiveness of caregivers. However, meta-analyses have shown that parenting behaviour accounts for about one third of the variance in attachment security or disorganisation. The exclusively environmental explanation has been challenged by results demonstrating some, albeit inconclusive, evidence of the effect of infant temperament. In this paper, after reviewing briefly the well-demonstrated familial and wider environmental influences, the evidence is reviewed for genetic and gene-environment interaction effects on developing early attachment relationships. Studies investigating the interaction of genes of monoamine neurotransmission with parenting environment in the course of early relationship development suggest that children&apos;s differential susceptibility to the rearing environment depends partly on genetic differences. In addition to the overview of environmental and genetic contributions to infant attachment, and especially to disorganised attachment relevant to mental health issues, the few existing studies of gene-attachment interaction effects on development of childhood behavioural problems are also reviewed. A short account of the most important methodological problems to be overcome in molecular genetic studies of psychological and psychiatric phenotypes is also given. Finally, animal research focusing on brain-structural aspects related to early care and the new, conceptually important direction of studying environmental programming of early development through epigenetic modification of gene functioning is examined in brief.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Judit Gervai</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2009, null:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-3-25</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-3-25-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/26">
        <title>Children with disrupted attachment histories: Interventions and psychophysiological indices of effects</title>
        <description>Diagnosis and treatment of children affected by disruptions of attachment (out of home placement, multiple changes of primary caregiver) is an area of considerable controversy. The possible contribution of psychobiological theories is discussed in three parts. The first part relates the attachment theoretical perspective to major psychobiological theories on the developmental associations of parent-child relationships and emotional response. The second part reviews studies of autonomic reactivity and HPA-axis activity with foster children, showing that foster children show more reactivity within physiological systems facilitating fight or flight behaviours rather than social engagement, especially foster children with atypical attachment behaviour. The third part is focused on treatment of children suffering from the consequences of disrupted attachment, based on a psychotherapy study with psychophysiological outcome measures. Implications are discussed for theory, diagnosis, and intervention.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Carlo Schuengel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mirjam Oosterman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paula Sterkenburg</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2009, null:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-3-26</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-3-26-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A): a clinical Trial for Patients with suicidal and self-injurious Behavior and Borderline Symptoms with a one-year Follow-up</title>
        <description>Background:
To date, there are no empirically validated treatments of good quality for adolescents showing suicidality and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior. Risk factors for suicide are impulsive and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior, depression, conduct disorders and child abuse. Behind this background, we tested the main hypothesis of our study; that Dialectical Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents is an effective treatment for these patients.
Methods:
Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) has been developed by Marsha Linehan - especially for the outpatient treatment of chronically non-suicidal patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. The modified version of DBT for Adolescents (DBT-A) from Rathus &amp; Miller has been adapted for a 16-24 week outpatient treatment in the German-speaking area by our group. The efficacy of treatment was measured by a pre-/post- comparison and a one-year follow-up with the aid of standardized instruments (SCL-90-R, CBCL, YSR, ILC, CGI).
Results:
In the pilot study, 12 adolescents were treated. At the beginning of therapy, 83% of patients fulfilled five or more DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder. From the beginning of therapy to one year after its end, the mean value of these diagnostic criteria decreased significantly from 5.8 to 2.75. 75% of patients were kept in therapy. For the behavioral domains according to the SCL-90-R and YSR, we have found effect sizes between 0.54 and 2.14.During treatment, non-suicidal self-injurious behavior reduced significantly. Before the start of therapy, 8 of 12 patients had attempted suicide at least once. There were neither suicidal attempts during treatment with DBT-A nor at the one-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
The promising results suggest that the interventions were well accepted by the patients and their families, and were associated with improvement in multiple domains including suicidality, non-suicidal self-injurious behavior, emotion dysregulation and depression from the beginning of therapy to the one-year follow-up.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Christian Fleischhaker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Renate Bohme</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Sixt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christiane Bruck</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Csilla Schneider</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eberhard Schulz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2011, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-01-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-5-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-5-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-01-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/4/1/1">
        <title>Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS): rationale, design, and methods</title>
        <description>ObjectiveTo present the design, methods, and rationale of the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS), a recently completed federally-funded, multi-site, randomized placebo-controlled trial that examined the relative efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT), sertraline (SRT), and their combination (COMB) against pill placebo (PBO) for the treatment of separation anxiety disorder (SAD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social phobia (SoP) in children and adolescents.
Methods:
Following a brief review of the acute outcomes of the CAMS trial, as well as the psychosocial and pharmacologic treatment literature for pediatric anxiety disorders, the design and methods of the CAMS trial are described.
Results:
CAMS was a six-year, six-site, randomized controlled trial. Four hundred eighty-eight (N = 488) children and adolescents (ages 7-17 years) with DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of SAD, GAD, or SoP were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: CBT, SRT, COMB, or PBO. Assessments of anxiety symptoms, safety, and functional outcomes, as well as putative mediators and moderators of treatment response were completed in a multi-measure, multi-informant fashion. Manual-based therapies, trained clinicians and independent evaluators were used to ensure treatment and assessment fidelity. A multi-layered administrative structure with representation from all sites facilitated cross-site coordination of the entire trial, study protocols and quality assurance.
Conclusions:
CAMS offers a model for clinical trials methods applicable to psychosocial and psychopharmacological comparative treatment trials by using state-of-the-art methods and rigorous cross-site quality controls. CAMS also provided a large-scale examination of the relative and combined efficacy and safety of the best evidenced-based psychosocial (CBT) and pharmacologic (SSRI) treatments to date for the most commonly occurring pediatric anxiety disorders. Primary and secondary results of CAMS will hold important implications for informing practice-relevant decisions regarding the initial treatment of youth with anxiety disorders.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00052078.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/4/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Scott Compton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Walkup</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne Albano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Piacentini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Boris Birmaher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joel Sherrill</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Golda Ginsburg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Moira Rynn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James McCracken</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Waslick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Satish Iyengar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Phillip Kendall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John March</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2010, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-4-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-4-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/13">
        <title>Non-suicidal self-injury, youth, and the Internet: What mental health professionals need to know
</title>
        <description>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) content and related e-communication have proliferated on the Internet in recent years. Research indicates that many youth who self-injure go online to connect with others who self-injure, view others&apos; NSSI experiences, and share their own through text and videos platforms. Although there are benefits to these behaviours in terms of receiving peer support, these activities can introduce these young people to risks, including NSSI reinforcement through the sharing of stories and strategies as well as risks for triggering NSSI urges. Due to the nature of these risks, mental health professionals need to know about them and how to effectively assess adolescents&apos; online activity in order to adequately monitor the effects of the purported benefits and risks associated with NSSI content. This article offers research informed clinical guidelines for the assessment, intervention, and monitoring of online NSSI activities. To help bridge the gap between youth culture and mental health culture, these essentials include descriptions of Community, Social Networking, and Video/Photo Sharing websites and the terms associated with these websites. Assessment of these behaviours can be facilitated by a basic Functional Assessment approach that is further informed using specific recommended online questions tailored to NSSI online and an assessment of the frequency, duration, and time of day of the online activities. Intervention in this area should initially assess readiness for change and use motivational interviewing to encourage substitution of healthier online activities for the activities that may currently foster harm.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Lewis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nancy Heath</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Natalie Michal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jamie Duggan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2012, null:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-6-13</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-6-13-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/12">
        <title>Non-suicidal self-injury (Nssi) in adolescent inpatients: assessing personality features and attitude toward death</title>
        <description>Background:
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a common concern among hospitalized adolescents, and can have significant implications for short and long-term prognosis. Little research has been devoted on how personality features in severely ill adolescents interact with NSSI and &quot;attitude toward life and death&quot; as a dimension of suicidality. Developing more specific assessment methodologies for adolescents who engage in self-harm without suicidal intent is relevant given the recent proposal of a non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) disorder and may be useful in predicting risk in psychiatrically impaired subjects.
Methods:
Consecutively hospitalized adolescents in a psychiatric unit (N = 52; 71% females; age 12-19 years), reporting at least one recent episode of self-harm according to the Deliberate Self-harm Inventory, were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Mental Disorders and Personality Disorders (SCID I and II), the Children&apos;s Depression Inventory and the Multi-Attitude Suicide Tendency Scale (MAST).
Results:
Mean age onset of NSSI in the sample was 12.3 years. All patients showed &quot;repetitive&quot; NSSI (high frequency of self-harm), covering different modalities. Results revealed that 63.5% of adolescents met criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and that the rest of the sample also met criteria for personality disorders with dysregulated traits. History of suicide attempts was present in 46.1% of cases. Elevated depressive traits were found in 53.8%. Results show a statistically significant negative correlation between the score on the &quot;Attraction to Life&quot; subscale of the MAST and the frequency and diversification of self-harming behaviors.
Conclusions:
Most adolescent inpatients with NSSI met criteria for emotionally dysregulated personality disorders, and showed a reduced &quot;attraction to life&quot; disposition and significant depressive symptoms. This peculiar psychopathological configuration must be addressed in the treatment of adolescent inpatients engaging in NSSI and taken into account for the prevention of suicidal behavior in self-injuring adolescents who do not exhibit an explicit intent to die.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/6/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Mauro Ferrara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arianna Terrinoni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Riccardo Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2012, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-6-12</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Adolescent inpatients engaging in non-suicidal self-injury displayed criteria for emotionally dysregulated personality disorders, and showed a reduced &apos;attraction to life&apos; disposition and significant depressive symptoms, suggesting clinicians also need to consider these additional variables.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-6-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/15">
        <title>Malignant catatonia due to anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis in a 17-year-old girl: case report </title>
        <description>Anti-NMDA-Receptor encephalitis is a severe form of encephalitis that was recently identified in the context of acute neuropsychiatric presentation. Here, we describe the case of a 17-year-old girl referred for an acute mania with psychotic features and a clinical picture deteriorated to a catatonic state. Positive diagnosis of anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis suggested specific treatment. She improved after plasma exchange and immunosuppressive therapy. Post-cognitive sequelae (memory impairment) disappeared within 2-year follow-up and intensive cognitive rehabilitation.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Angele Consoli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karine Ronen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Isabelle An-Gourfinkel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martine Barbeau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donata Marra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathalie Costedoat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Delphine Montefiore</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philippe Maksud</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olivier Bonnot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adrien Didelot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zahir Amoura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marie Vidailhet</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Cohen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2011, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-5-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-5-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-05-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/26">
        <title>A three-country comparison of psychotropic medication prevalence in youth</title>
        <description>Background:
The study aims to compare cross-national prevalence of psychotropic medication use in youth.
Methods:
A population-based analysis of psychotropic medication use based on administrative claims data for the year 2000 was undertaken for insured enrollees from 3 countries in relation to age group (0&#8211;4, 5&#8211;9, 10&#8211;14, and 15&#8211;19), gender, drug subclass pattern and concomitant use. The data include insured youth aged 0&#8211;19 in the year 2000 from the Netherlands (n = 110,944), Germany (n = 356,520) and the United States (n = 127,157).
Results:
The annual prevalence of any psychotropic medication in youth was significantly greater in the US (6.7%) than in the Netherlands (2.9%) and in Germany (2.0%). Antidepressant and stimulant prevalence were 3 or more times greater in the US than in the Netherlands and Germany, while antipsychotic prevalence was 1.5&#8211;2.2 times greater. The atypical antipsychotic subclass represented only 5% of antipsychotic use in Germany, but 48% in the Netherlands and 66% in the US. The less commonly used drugs e.g. alpha agonists, lithium and antiparkinsonian agents generally followed the ranking of US&gt;Dutch&gt;German youth with very rare (less than 0.05%) use in Dutch and German youth. Though rarely used, anxiolytics were twice as common in Dutch as in US and German youth. Prescription hypnotics were half as common as anxiolytics in Dutch and US youth and were very uncommon in German youth. Concomitant drug use applied to 19.2% of US youth which was more than double the Dutch use and three times that of German youth.
Conclusion:
Prominent differences in psychotropic medication treatment patterns exist between youth in the US and Western Europe and within Western Europe. Differences in policies regarding direct to consumer drug advertising, government regulatory restrictions, reimbursement policies, diagnostic classification systems, and cultural beliefs regarding the role of medication for emotional and behavioral treatment are likely to account for these differences.</description>
        <link>http://www.capmh.com/content/2/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Julie Zito</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Safer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katrin Janhsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joerg Fegert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Gardner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerd Glaeske</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Satish Valluri</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2008, null:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1753-2000-2-26</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Comparing psychotropic drug prescribing patterns</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Significant differences exist in the prescribing of psychotropic drugs to children and young people in the US and Western Europe and are important when considering policies affecting these medications.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1753-2000-2-26-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1753-2000</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

